James Rhodes, a pianist, performed a Bach composition for his Youtube channel, but it didn’t stay up – Youtube’s Content ID system pulled it down and accused him of copyright infringement
because Sony Music Global had claimed that they owned 47 seconds’ worth
of his personal performance of a song whose composer has been dead for
300 years.
Just last week, German music professor Ulrich Kaiser posted his research
on automated censorship of classical music, in which he found that it
was nearly impossible to post anything by composers like Bartok,
Schubert, Puccini and Wagner, because companies large and small have
fraudulently laid claim to their whole catalogs.
Europeans have one week to contact their MEPs to head off this catastrophe.
Stop what you’re doing and contact two friends in the EU right now and send them to Save Your Internet – before it’s too late.
HI!! REMEMBER BACK IN JULY WHERE WE GOT FIRST PART OF ARTICLE 13 STOPPED? WELL NOW WE´RE IN ROUND 2!!
WE NEED TO STOP THIS!!
AND WE ONLY HAVE A FEW DAYS!!! THE VOTE IS SET FOR 12 SEPT.!!
IF YOU LIVE IN EU CALL YOUR MP AND ASK THEM TO VOTE NO
AND YOU LIVE OUTSIDE EU PLZ SHARE SO AS MANY PPL AS POSSIBLE SEES THIS
I ONLY SAW A POST ABOUT IT TODAY , 7 SEPT.!!
WE NEED TO SPREAD THE WORD!!!!!!
This is fucking ridiculous.
Im pretty sure music copyright laws literally state that 70 years after the death of the composer it’s basically fair game
That’s current copyright law in most of Europe. It’s more complicated in the US – but most of these compositions were out of copyright before any of us were born.
Companies are claiming they own the copyright – committing copyright fraud – because they know that users who post things don’t have the legal resources to go after them. The DMCA has penalties for false reports, but nobody uses them; the courts don’t see false claims as a reason to get involved.