the–mantling–dark:

Thor: *pouts into the room*

Loki: *looks up from a book he stole from Dr Strange* What now? 

Thor: Itchy.

Loki: *sighs* How long does it take to get there.

Thor: What?

Loki: This Midgardian catastrophe you’re taking us to. Iji. How long-

Thor: No, not Iji, itchy. Like the thing you scratch. My eye… socket. The patch made it itch… so I took it off.

Loki: Yes.

Thor: …

Loki: Problem solved… so… ?

Thor: So.

Loki: *sighs* You look fine.

Thor: *unconvinced nodding*

Loki: Better than fine. Better than everything. Distractingly handsome. Please take your diversion of a self to wherever Strange might be hiding so he won’t notice when I steal all his books.

Thor: *dreamy blushing*

A few things I learnt from the ‘Thor: Ragnarok’ commentary:

luxury-loki:

1. the commodore ship is the colours of the Australian aboriginal’s traditional flag.

2. The left head of the three headed champion fighter has Taika Waititi’s face.

3. In the scene where Thor is being nursed in Hulk’s room, 1 woman is Hemsowrth’s wife and another is Waititi’s wife.

4. The shot where they pan from Loki and Valkyrie to the reflection in the floor was nicknamed “The greatest shot in the history of cinema” by the crew.

5. Chris Hemsworth and Tom Hiddleston are not in fact brothers. Crazy.

6. The line “He’s a friend from work!” was actually thought of by a young boy who visited the set as part of ‘make a wish’. He told Chris to say it as he thought it was funny, and now it’s the most famous line from the film!

7. Jeff Goldblum would sometimes just ad-lib for 4-5 minutes at a time, and it would be incredible.

Y’all know they only said it was “the greatest shot in the history of cinema” because it’s got two great views of two great asses.

lokimymuse:

#crying because this is the same room that his life fell apart in#those are the same steps that his identity was shattered on#this is the place where he broke#all those years ago in the first movie#and now hes back#and look how much has changed#frosty bby#thor ragnarok

(tags by @musclesandhammering​)

But of course we’re not going to talk about any of that. Because Loki is just over it, right? Or if he’s not, he should be. His emotional problems are totally bumming Thor out.

delyth88:

prison-mikes-bandana:

The planet is about to be destroyed by Surtur because of Ragnarok. Why would someone leave an infinity stone on a planet about to be destroyed? It’s only seen as sneaky because loki is grabbing it. It would’ve been seen as logical if Thor had grabbed it instead

I agree. Surely it’s better to have it than leave it to be destroyed or lost.

latent-thoughts:

burningarbiterheart:

endiness:

more reasons why i don’t understand how people can say t////’s version of loki was good and that he understood him: the movie literally mocks all of the serious, emotionally meaningful, significant moments for loki in past movies that gave insight into his character and fleshed him out and gave him depth and complexity. that alone implies some kind of intentional maliciousness to what went into creating his character for this movie.

and, ffs, look at how everything else that went into creating the thor franchise was treated: jane was written out in a line of dialogue. darcy and selvig weren’t even mentioned. the warriors three were unceremoniously killed off as fast as possible. sif wasn’t even mentioned. asgard being destroyed was used as a punchline. even thor’s characterization felt like it was made by someone who didn’t like thor in the past movies, either, and wanted to make him into their misguided idea of a better character. like, how the fuck could the movie have treated loki with respect and have any regard for his character when it didn’t for anything else!?

@latent-thoughts

I concur with the many points raised above. 

I understand that Darcy and Erik didn’t work as part of s plot so they were not mentioned at all. That’s still better than what they did with characters like Jane and warriors 3. 

I’ve also been mentioning the OOC behaviour of everyone, from Thor and Loki to even Bruce. Now, I can understand Bruce acting like that, after such a long time of Hulk taking over. I’m sure he was not feeling himself and was hence acting all nervous and sans filter.

Further, there was way too much pontificating going on. The whole holier than thou attitude of the characters, especially Thor and Valkyrie, against Loki, really irked me. I need to see a character do heroic acts, not claim himself to be a hero and justify his acts thusly as heroic. Valkyrie had her hypocritical moment when she threw the bottle at Loki and asked why he felt the urge to do the right thing. She was a willful participant in human trafficking, she sold people off to die for booze. I understand that she was suffering from severe PTSD, but that didn’t give her the right to do those shitty things. I still am ok with that story arc, as she eventually woke up from her haze of trauma and helped people of Asgard. But she didn’t have the moral high ground to act as though she was a better person than Loki, or that she even knew Loki enough to judge him on his actions.

The movie wants us to think that Thor and Valkyrie pontificating is justified, that it’s the right thing to do, because… that’s what heroes do. The perspective of the movie is too centred on projecting a heroic image for certain characters rather than showing why or how they are heroic.