imaginetrilobites:

philosopherking1887:

imaginetrilobites:

philosopherking1887:

imaginetrilobites:

i wish whedon didn’t cancel his twitter so that i could just waltz in and ask what the hell this is 

He ships Thorki and Superhusbands. It’s as plain as the anguished yearning on their faces.

Yep I honestly think if it were up to him they WOULD be canon, especially Stony. 

That log-splitting scene in AOU, good God. Control your thirst, all of you.

Re: your tag about Bruce/Nat as Angel/Buffy… is that because Bruce and Buffy are both Whedon’s self-inserts? I can see that. But I could also see Tony as his stand-in and Steve as having aspects of Angel, including the out-of-timeness and the brooding. But not the guilt, that’s definitely Natasha. I thought Bruce/Nat made sense because they share the profound guilt and self-loathing, but they don’t try to cover it up as theatrically as Tony does.

Oh man that’s way deeper than my logic. Mostly because, like Bruce, Angel is this mild-mannered nice guy, but then a Thing happens and he can easily kill her, and tries. But eventually she overpowers him anyway. Also Nat, like Buffy, didn’t want the life she had to live, she was forced to become an assassin/The One, but eventually she owned it and turned it into something that’s entirely her own. 

Oh, OK, that works too.