van-dyne:

the fact that people only see Jane’s (potential) return will ‘ruin’ Thor’s character is hilarious and offending at the same time. Girl is an astrophysicist, girl is an expert in quantum physics and space, girl had been a host for an infinity stone and survived. She has knowledge and experience to bring to the table, she is HER OWN CHARACTER and she is NOT defined by Thor or anyone. You all fake feminists praising Thor for being a feminist, for supporting women, and then you turn around and reduce Jane Foster, the world’s foremost astronomer,  to Thor’s ex who will ruin his character. I see you there.

Taika Waititi and Chris Hemsworth were the people who ruined Thor’s character. He was just fine when Jane was around.

I’m honestly kind of stunned by the people saying that Ragnarok!Thor is a feminist. We have absolutely no good evidence of that, and a lot of circumstantial evidence (i.e., the fact that he’s a complete douchebro) that he probably isn’t. But then, I’m stunned by people saying Ragnarok!Thor is a great interpretation of Thor’s character, or a “ray of sunshine,” or anything other than a self-absorbed tool. So why does this surprise me?